Difference with overs and unders ? Started by: Fran J

  • Author
    Posts
  • Fran J -1
    -1p
    Menu

    Hi everyone does anyone know much about the difference in appearance between overs and unders? Is it true the same size implant will look slightly bigger if they are overs? I have 275cc overs put in Wednesday Dr Singh said I had to have overs due to mild scoliosis, I was a 32B before starting to get curious as to what size I’ll probably measure considering they’re overs etc … Being impatient but can anyone make a good guess based on theirs haha xxx

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    Hi I have overs I have 300cc on left an 340cc on right. I was a a/ b before and need up dd I’m now booked in for my second op 9th jan with mr singh to have 700cc

    Anonymous
    0p
    Menu

    They say 150cc a cup size but i believe u get a little more out of the ccs than that my guess is 32D/DD xx

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    Sorry I mean I am a dd now so what do u think 700cc will make me. It’s confusing. My pc said get a 36 h

    Anonymous
    0p
    Menu

    My guess would be H as im a G with 600s i was a empty B pre op so similar starting point to u xx

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    thank u. I’ve not come across a h size only g been looking for a good sports bra so far find a good one only g size thou in next.

    Anonymous
    0p
    Menu

    I would get a macom hun as the cups adjust to ur size xx

    Jasmine 10
    10p
    Menu

    Hi Kayleigh I had 800 cc from 36 c and i have ended up a 34 h I really dont look it though hope this helps dr dingh is just amazing! xxx

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    Thanks jasmine do u might if I add you.

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    It’s really hard to find h bras. Missy thanks for telling me about macom ive ordered one from there. But will need to order a few others please let me know any other sites shops please. Thank you

    Anonymous
    0p
    Menu

    Urs look really big in ur profile pic jasmine xx

    Jasmine 10
    10p
    Menu

    of course not hun add away yea its really hard debenhams is really good i can squeeze in to a g cup although its tight haha worse probelsm to have though add away xx

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    Thanks just added you. Yeah I can not wait now I’m soooo excited I was a little scared to get 700cc but I can not wait now. Lol

    Anonymous
    0p
    Menu

    Ive no idea where to get bigger ones.. have u tried ebay? Xx

    Kayleigh 36
    36p
    Menu

    Well I’ve ordered the macom one and been looking online. My friend is a jj but all natural lucky cow lol she has told me online so got a few places now thanks

    Anonymous
    6p
    Menu

    Hey huni I’m 34GG/H if u wanna add me to x

    Anonymous
    6p
    Menu

    Hey huni this is the best sports as they don’t go off cup size it goes off width and you will need to get filleted for it in debhams my is 36F even thou I’m 35GG/H and I’ve got loads of room it’s called White ultimate run sports bra

    Anonymous
    6p
    Menu

    implant placement over the muscle in the sub-glandular position, completely in contact with the breast tissue. The result of implants over the muscle provides a round augmented look in many patients, but many women prefer the round and somewhat less natural look. In the “over” approach the implants are inside the breast. Advantages are ease of the surgery, which can be accomplished by almost any surgeon, avoidance of mastopexy in mild ptosis (although it usually makes the ptosis worse later), less post-op discomfort, since only skin and fat are cut. This approach allows insertion of oversize implants, which is again what some women want. Disadvantages are marked interference with mammograms (about 40% obstruction – see reference below), clear visibility and feel of implant edges, visible and palpable rippling of the skin over the implants, especially with any textured implants, higher rate of capsule contracture, high rate of later implant downward migration or “bottoming-out”, and difficulty correcting later posts problems when they occur. For the above reasons I seldom recommend implants over the muscle anymore.

    Anonymous
    6p
    Menu

    (This Partlis a lot girls get this mixed up with unders ) partial submuscular implant coverage with implants placed under the muscle via either an areola (nipple) incision or an inframammary crease incision, thus disrupting the muscle support fascia at the lower pole of the implant to allow it to enter the space under the muscle. With this approach the implants are mostly behind the breast. This approach has the Advantages of mostly separating the implants from the muscle, facilitating unobstructed mammography, a more natural look with a soft transition from the flat of the upper chest wall to the round shape of the implant, much less visibility and feel of the implant edges, usually no rippling (except textured implants), and low risk of capsule contracture, as long as the implants have not been contaminated by ductal germs while being passed through the breast tissues. Disadvantages include a bit more discomfort early post-op, technique a bit more difficult than over the muscle, and the loss of the lower pole support fascia which leave the implants supported by the same weak skin tissues as implants over the muscle, leading to later downward bottoming-out of the implants in a few patients as is frequently seen in implants over the muscle.

    Anonymous
    6p
    Menu

    (Unders)Complete implant muscle coverage is shown at left with intact muscle fascia supporting the lower pole of the implant. This support fascia is the extension of the muscle envelope from the pectoralis muscles to the abdominal rectus muscles, and the finger shaped serratus anterior muscles to the sides, and is a stout collagen sheet which stretches slowly after implant placement, but provides reliable long-term internal bra-like support to prevent “bottoming-out”. With this approach the implants are totally behind the breast. Complete muscle coverage of the implant, without cutting through the muscles, can only be achieved by trans-axillary approach, entering the space under the muscle where it lies closest to the skin in the anterior axillary fold. The Advantages of this approach are ease of placement, natural breast shape no implant visibility, no rippling of the implant surface (except textured implants in thin women), lower capsule contracture risk, since the breasts are completely separated from the implant, and no ducts with germs are damaged while placing the implants, low mammography interference, good internal support, and no scars on the breast. Disadvantages are the difficulty mastering the procedure, thus it is not available from all surgeons, muscle discomfort post-op, and implants which tend early to be a bit full superiorly, until the support fascia stretches. This is my preferred technique for the majority of patients.

You must log in to reply to this topic.

Arrange a free consultation

Need some help?

Start a live chat session with one of our expert advisors.

Start Chat

Don't notify me about this again.